{"id":2453,"date":"2025-07-18T10:13:08","date_gmt":"2025-07-18T13:13:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/oliveiraalves.com.br\/?p=2453"},"modified":"2025-07-25T15:04:30","modified_gmt":"2025-07-25T18:04:30","slug":"stf-restabelece-aumento-do-iof-por-decreto-e-exclui-incidencia-sobre-risco-sacado","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/oliveiraalves.com.br\/en\/stf-restabelece-aumento-do-iof-por-decreto-e-exclui-incidencia-sobre-risco-sacado\/","title":{"rendered":"STF Reinstates IOF Increase by Decree and Excludes Incidence on \u201cRisco Sacado\u201d Transactions"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On July 16, 2025, the Federal Supreme Court (STF) granted a preliminary injunction reinstating the effects of Decree No. 12,499\/2025, which had previously been partially suspended by a decision of Justice Luiz Fux. The aforementioned decree increased several IOF (Tax on Financial Transactions) rates, directly affecting credit, foreign exchange, insurance, and investment operations.<\/p>\n<p>The constitutionality of Decree No. 12,499\/2025 was upheld, based on the regulatory nature of the IOF, whose rates may be modified by Executive action, in accordance with Article 153, \u00a71 of the Brazilian Federal Constitution.<\/p>\n<p>However, the decision maintained the suspension of the IOF\u2019s application to \u201crisco sacado\u201d (assigned receivables with recourse) transactions, on the grounds that such transactions do not qualify as credit operations and, therefore, cannot be taxed via decree.<\/p>\n<p>As a result of the ruling, the new rates established by the decree are reinstated, including:<\/p>\n\n<table id=\"tablepress-6\" class=\"tablepress tablepress-id-6\">\n<thead>\n<tr class=\"row-1\">\n\t<th class=\"column-1\">Transaction Type<\/th><th class=\"column-2\">Previous Rate<\/th><th class=\"column-3\">New Rate<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"row-2\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\">International credit card transactions<\/td><td class=\"column-2\">3.38%<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">3.50%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-3\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\">Purchase of foreign currency in cash<\/td><td class=\"column-2\">1.10%<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">3.50%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-4\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\">Overseas remittances (travel)<\/td><td class=\"column-2\">1.10%<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">3.50%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-5\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\">Overseas remittances (investments)<\/td><td class=\"column-2\">0.38%<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">1.10%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-6\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\">VGBL investments (from 2026 onwards)<\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Exempt<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">5% on the amount exceeding BRL 600,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-7\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\">FIDC (primary tranche acquisitions)<\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Exempt<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">0.38%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<!-- #tablepress-6 from cache -->\n<p>The decision applies retroactively to the date of the decree\u2019s publication (June 11, 2025), which may have significant implications for transactions carried out during the suspension period.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Practical Implications:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Taxpayers who refrained from collecting the IOF based on the previous suspension should assess potential retroactive tax liabilities;<\/li>\n<li>\u201cRisco sacado\u201d transactions remain excluded from the IOF\u2019s scope, with support from the STF\u2019s decision;<\/li>\n<li>The preliminary injunction is still subject to review by the Court\u2019s Full Bench, which may confirm or alter the current understanding;<\/li>\n<li>The matter is likely to be subject to further litigation, particularly regarding the retroactive application of the tax and the legality of its increase by decree.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Our firm remains available to assess the specific impacts of this measure on your operations and to advise on appropriate next steps.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On July 16, 2025, the Federal Supreme Court (STF) granted a preliminary injunction reinstating the effects of Decree No. 12,499\/2025, which had previously been partially [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":2458,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2453","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-tributario"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/oliveiraalves.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2453","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/oliveiraalves.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/oliveiraalves.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/oliveiraalves.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/oliveiraalves.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2453"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/oliveiraalves.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2453\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2477,"href":"https:\/\/oliveiraalves.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2453\/revisions\/2477"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/oliveiraalves.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2458"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/oliveiraalves.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2453"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/oliveiraalves.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2453"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/oliveiraalves.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2453"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}